c.

mainly it was felt to be a heterosexual problem

which they should solve.

It was voted by a majority that:

1. There is a need to have scientific study of homosexuality freed of value judgments; the need to have scholars study human behavior without censoring out homosexual factors; the right to free, frank, scientific reporting.

2.

30

4.

5.

The need to have homosexuality studied objectively, 1.0., without the over-presont haterosexual frame of reference; the need to have homosexuality presented as simply a mode of behavior, not a deviation, a variation, perversion, inversion, eto.

The need for impartial sex education of young people concerning homosexuality; the right to invite scientists to fearlessly sook out and present factual information on the topic to adolescents; the need for objectivity from case workers concerning the topic.

The right to defense from faulty court testimony by psychologists, psychiatrists, etc.

The need for supportivo therapy, 1.0., adjustment therapy for homosexuals to a homosexual role.

As to uses of the final document, it was felt that until the final document was drafted and the questionnaires tabulated, that no uses could be prodicated.

An alternate view was that in any case it should be published as a report or a survey of a segment of homophile opinion on Rights and Noods.

COMMITTEE V. LEGAL RIGHTS

A. To preparo the section of the Bill dealing with the legal rights of homosexuals, and with homosexual behavior;

B. To give special attention to discriminatory judicial and law-enforcement attitudes toward homosexuals; tho

17